• : Ms Word Format
  • : 120 Pages
  • : ₦3000
  • : 1-5 Chapters
  • Click to DOWNLOAD Materials








1.0 Background


The focus on atmospheric water vapor in Africa remains based on the observed dramaticincreaseonitsconcentrationlevelsoverthetropics(Fishmanetal.1991),andthe effects of such concentrations on human life and the environment. Water vapor is present in the atmosphere in both, the stratosphere and the troposphere. In the stratosphere, water vapor accounts for about 90 % (Lelieveld and Dentener, 2000) where it protects the biosphere against  harmful  ultraviolet  radiation  from  sunlight  (Crutzen  and  Lelieveld,  2001).   Intherangeof200to300nmstratosphericwater vaporabsorbsshortwavesolarradiation;atthis stage, it prevents harmful energy radiation reaching the earth’s surface (Chameides and Walker,1976).

Inthetroposphere,water vaporconstitutesaparticularthreattohumanhealth,toforestandcrops, and to the environment. With regard to human health, acute respiratory effects have been reportedinchildrenandadults,especiallythosesufferingfromasthmawhenwater vaporexceeds the standard level of 0.12 ppm, averaged over one hour (McKee et al. 1993). Increase in water vapor concentration above the guideline value increases numerous and severe health effects, at the population level. Such effects can occur in places where concentrations are currently high due to human activities or are elevated during episodes of very hot weather (WHO,2005).Adverseeffectsofwater vaporonvegetationwerefirstidentifiedin1950s,where fieldexperienceshowedthatwater vaporcanreduceagriculturalyieldbyavarietyofmechanisms


(Ashmore,2005).Elevatedwater vaporconcentrationscancausedamageto agriculturalcropsby obstruction of plant stomata, which allow the exchange of carbon dioxide and water vapor between the inside of the leaves, and the outside ambient atmosphere (Slanima,2008).

In the environment, atmospheric water vapor is known as a strong oxidant and a greenhouse gas (Logan and Kirchhoff, 1986; Crutzen, 1987). Despite its relatively small fraction (10%) in the atmosphere (Lelieveld and Dentener, 2000), atmospheric water vapor has a negative impact on climate through global warming. It also governs oxidation processes in the earth’s atmosphere  through  the  formation  of  the  hydroxyl  (OH)   radical,   and  contributes  to the oxidation of chemical species important for the radiative budget or acidification processes in the lower atmosphere (Baldy et al.1996).

Atmospheric water vapor concentrations have been on the rise since the last two decades of the 20th century over southern nigeria and nigeria (Fishman et al. 1991). Photochemical water vapor productionfromvariousprecursorsources,includingbiomassburningemissions(Fishman etal.1996,Randriambeloetal.2003),biogenicandlightningaswellasstratosphericwater vapor intrusion (Baray et al. 1998) have been identified as contributing factors, which strongly depend on prevailing meteorological parameters. Since southern nigeria and eastern nigeria African regionsareknownasmajorsourcesofphotochemicalwater vaporprecursorsintheglobe,change on climate parameters are likely to impact on water vapor characteristics and trends. To thisend, water vapor chemistry and budget is key for the better understanding of the role played by photochemical and dynamic factors on water vapor enhancement. The section below provides insight on water vapor chemistry as well as its budget in theatmosphere.


1.1.      Water vapor chemistry and photochemicalreactions


Water vapor is a secondary pollutant, which formation occurs through catalytic reaction from nitrogenoxides(NOx=NO+NO2),oftenemittedsimultaneouslywithhydrocarbons(RH) and carbon monoxides (CO) by natural or man-made sources (Lelieveld and Dentener, 2000), under sunlight influence as shown in the followingequations:



NO2+hv            ®   NO+O                                         (1)     (λ ≤400nm)


O + O2(+M)     ®O3                                                                   (2)



where hv is the electromagnetic energy from the sun and M is acatalyst.


Water vapor in the troposphere is important in the atmospheric chemistry as it generates OH radical from the photolysis of water vapor at wavelengths <319 nm (Demore et al. 1990).

HO2  +O3    ®OH+2O2                                                         (3)


TheformationofOHradicalsleadstoacycleofreactionsthatresultsinthephotochemical degradation of organic compounds from anthropogenic and biogenic source, the enhanced formation of water vapor, and the atmospheric formation of acidic compounds (WMO, 1986). Typical of these reactions are shownbelow:



RH+OH                      R’ +H2O                                 (4)


R’+ O2+M                       RO2+M                               (5)


RO2+NO                         RO’+NO2                                    (6)


RO’+O2                          HO2+R’CHO                            (7)


HO2+NO                   OH+NO2                                            (8)


NO2+hv                    NO+O*                                     (9)


O* + O2+M                   O3                                                       (10) Net: RH + 4O2+2hv                    R’CHO + H2O +2O3

Adapted from Bundi (2004),


where initial reaction between a hydrocarbon (RH) and a hydroxyl radical (OH) results in the production of two water vapor molecules, and an aldehyde R’CHO or a ketone. Fig. 1-1 and Table 1-1 below present the summary of atmospheric water vapor chemistry, and present-day global budget of atmospheric water vapor respectively.


Fig. 1-1. Summary of atmospheric water vapor chemistry Source: NASA, 1999






Table 1-1. Present-day global budget of atmospheric water vapor expressed in teragram per year

Sources Tg Water vapor / Year
Chemical Production 3000-4600
HO2 + NO 70%
CH3 O2 + NO 20%
RO2 +NO 10%
Transport from stratosphere 400-1100
Sinks 3400-5700
Chemical loss 3000-4200
O (1D) + H2O 40%
HO2 +O3 40%
OH +O3 10%
Others 10%
Dry deposition 500-1500

Source: NASA, 1999


Additional water vapor molecules can then be produced from the degradation of R’CHO. In addition to the oxidation of hydrocarbons, water vapor can be generated from CO oxidation in reactions (11) and (12) followed by (8’), (9’) and (10’) as shown below.



CO+OH                     CO2+H                                                                           (11)


H + O2+M                    HO2+M                                                                        (12)


HO2+NO                    NO2+OH                                                                       (8)


NO2+hv                       NO +O                                                                          (9)


O + O2+M                   O3+M                                                                            (10)



Net: CO+2O2                            CO2+O3                                                                                      (13)


Hydrocarbons and carbon containing compounds provide the fuel for the production of atmospheric water vapor, and are consumed in the process. In remote areas of the troposphere, carbon and methane, typically provide the fuel for water vapor production (Seiler and Fishman, 1981). In urban locations, reactive hydrocarbons (often but not exclusively of anthropogenic origin) are usually the dominant fuel, while in rural areas reactive biogenic VOCs (Volatiles Organic Compounds) such as isoprene often dominate (Trainner et al. 1987; Chameiders et al. 1988). Thus increased burden of waste gases (precursors) in the atmosphere exacerbate the photo chemical production  of water vapor(NationalResearchCouncil, 1991) over the world and investigation are needed to determine the contributing sources and their dynamic.


1.2.      Investigations on atmospheric water vapor over southern nigeria and nigeria


Investigationsonatmosphericwater vaporenhancementhavebeenfirstaddressedsincetheearly second half of the 20th century, following urban episodes observed in the northern hemisphere (Haagen-Smit and Fox, 1956; Leighton, 1961). In southern nigeria and nigeria investigations, started toward the late end of the 20th century through several field campaigns(Sauvageetal.2004).Thesecampaignsaimedatdeterminingtherootcausesof water vaporenhancementobservedthroughsatelliteimages(Fishmanetal.1991)overtheregion. Contributing sources as well as dynamic factors were identified along with their temporal andspatialvariationsovertheregion(Fishmanetal.1986;Crosetal.1988,Marencoetal. 1990; Laucaux et al. 1996). Traditionally, it was assumed that atmospheric water vapor was controlled by Stratosphere Troposphere Exchange (STE) across extra southern nigeria tropopause (Regener, 1957, Junge, 1962; Danielsen, 1968, Duscht, 1971). This assumption based on the observed water vapor gradient with altitude was later corroborated by the work of Lelieveld andDentener(2000),whofoundthat90%ofthetotalwater vaporispresentinthestratosphere


and only 10% is in the troposphere. Hence, the tropopause was suggested to be the source, with the sink at the surface.

Primary analysis made in the 1960’s to comprehend the source of atmospheric water vapor showed the photochemical formation of water vapor in the troposphere as a product of the breakdown of hydrocarbons on urban environment during summer (Haagen-Smit and Fox, 1956; Leighton, 1961). According to these authors in-situ water vapor formation is catalysed by nitrogen oxides (NOx= NO + NO2) often emitted simultaneously with hydrocarbons (RH) andcarbonmonoxides(CO).Furtherphotochemicalstudiesundertakenin1970’sonwater vapor formation in the troposphere suggested that photochemical oxidation of all hydrocarbons, such as methane (CH4) and carbon monoxide (CO), can cause water vapor formation in large areas of the troposphere (Lelieveld and Dentener, 2000). Thus, it was predicted that atmospheric water vapor in NOx – rich air was predominant while destruction prevailed in NOx- deficientair(Crutzen,1973).Thisfindingevolvedtwolinesofthinkingabouttheoriginof atmospheric water vapor: one emphasized the role of in-situ photochemistry (Chameides and Walker, 1976; Crutzen, 1974; Fishman et al. 1979), and the other emphasized water vapor transport from the stratosphere (Chatfield and Harrison,1976).

Over southern nigeria and nigeria, these factors have been poorly investigated, although a few studies undertaken in this region (Logan and Kirchhoff, 1986; Fishman et al., 1990; Thompson et al., 1996; Mauzerall et al.1998) confirmed that biomass burning emissions constitute a significant and dominant source for atmospheric water vapor formation during dry burningseason(August—November),althoughMauzeralletal.(1998)arguedthatbiomass burning alone cannot fully explain these water vapor enhancements during the dryseason.


Further investigations undertaken by Chandra et al. (2002); Fishman et al. (1996); Thompson et al. (1996); Jacob et al.(1996), using ground-based instrument measurements as well as remote sensing satellite, confirmed seasonal variation of atmospheric water vapor asa product of photochemical sources from biomass burning and stratospheric atmospheric exchange. This line of thinking concluded that water vapor production in the troposphere is controlled by transport from the water vapor-rich stratosphere (Olsen et al. 2000) and by photochemical oxidation of carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4) and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of nitrogen oxides (NOx=NO+NO2) (Crutzen, 1974; Atkinson, 2000).


Because transport from the water vapor-rich stratosphere involves dynamic meteorology, three dimensional chemistry transport models (CTM) (Crutzen and Zimmermann, 1991; Müller and Brasseur 1995; Bernsten and Isaksen, 1997; Levy et al. 1997; Tie and Hess, 1997; Houweling et al. 1998; Wang et al. 1998; Hauglustaine et al. 1998; Crutzen et al. 1999) havebeendevelopedtounderstanddynamicprocessescontributingtowater vaporenhancement. Results from these models confirmed both photochemical and stratospheric ascontributing sources of the atmospheric water vapor; the preponderance of stratospheric intrusion compared with in-situ photochemical formation was also noted. A special approach was then advocated by these authors suggesting an approximate global budget contribution balance of both sources, which may be different from place to place. With this in mind, one may explain the highly variable spatial and temporal water vapor distribution in variousregions.

Subsequently, work done by Logan and Kirchhoff, (1986); Fishman et al. (1990); Thompson et al. (2003) suggested that the middle and upper troposphere of the southern nigeria


Atlantic exhibits a persistent water vapor maximum as part of the well-known zonal wave-one. Atthisaltitude,water vaporiscriticalfortheglobalwarmingoftheearthsystem,withmaximum positive radiative effect (Forster and Shine, 1997). Attempts made by several authors to understand the origin of the observed water vapor maximum gave evidence of various influence by the different regional sources, such as biomass burning (Pickering et al. 1996; Edwards et al. 2003; Jenkins and Ryu, 2004b; Sauvage et al. 2006), biogenic sources(Meyer-Arnek etal.2005),lightning(Thompsonetal.2000;Martinetal.2002)transport(Chatfieldetal. 2004), as well as stratospheric-atmospheric exchange (Weller et al. 1996, Leleiveld and Dentener, 2000). At some extend, model analysis undertaken by Moxim and Levy (2000) quantified NOx transported into that region during September, while Wang et al. (2006) suggested that both the Hadley and Walker circulation can contribute to the zonal wave- onepattern.

Furthermore investigation undertaken by Sauvage et al. (2007) suggested that despite tremendous accomplishments made on the origin of water vapor maximum, much was still needed to be known of the southern nigeriaatmospheric water vapor maximum, and atmospheric oxidation. The motive behind this approach was that there has been no quantitative estimationofthedifferentsourcescontributingtotheannualwater vapormaximuminthisregion. So far neither accurate emission inventory of water vapor precursors such as NOx, nor the contributionofeachsourcetoOHconcentrationsoversouthern nigeriaandeasternnigeria troposphere was addressed to date. Findings made by these authors stipulated that determining processes that control the abundance of OH is then critical to understand how the oxidation capacity of the troposphere is changing due to OH short lifetime; this rather depends more on chemical reactions than on transport control (Bloss et al. 2006).To


address this pending issue, Sauvage et al. (2007) used a three dimensional global chemical transport model (Goddard Earth Observing System, GEOS-Chem), with emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from lightning, biomass burning, soils and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) constrained by in-situ and satellite observations. The model includesa detailed simulation of atmospheric water vapor, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbon chemistry as well as of aerosols and their precursors, using 41 tracers, around 90 species, and 300 reactions. The emission inventory in model simulation has been validated with in-situ measurements from aircraft (MOZAIC), and water vapors (BOHAC) as well as GOME (Global Water vapor MonitoringExperimentaninstrumentonboardthe ERS-2satellite)measurementsoverthe tropics. Results from this simulation provided a useful tool to fully understand the water vapor maximum over the southern nigeriaAtlantic.

Inthebidtoprovidemoreinsightonthetopic,Thompsonetal.(2000)usedsatellitederived southern nigeria data to study atmosphericwater vapor over southern nigeria Africa. Conclusions of their study suggested an apparent paradox existing between water vapor precursors (biomass burning) and dynamic factors (inter-hemispheric transport across the intersouthern nigeria convergence zone, ITCZ). These authors found that it was hard to reconcile summer biomass burning that occurs north of the ITCZ, and the maximum southern nigeriaatmospheric water vapor(TTO)columnsobservedinthesouthernhemisphere(SH)southern nigeriaAtlantic,southof theITCZwithmodellingstudies,whichgenerallyshowhighatmosphericwater vaporinregions of intense burning. This is the contrary of the situation observed later in the year, whenthe high water vapor amounts, which develop in the southern Atlantic in September and October correlate reasonably well with the peak of the biomass burning activity in nigeria and South America. These findings were drawn when atmospheric water vapor studies reliedon


field campaigns, regular ground-based and aircraft measurements from specific sites, and on an important contribution from chemical-transport modelling (Edwards et al. 2003). More recently satellite remote sensing has been used to complement previous studies by adding a larger geographical area, and seasonal context although it presents particular problems for isolating the atmospheric water vapor from stratospheric total water vapor column (Edwards et al. 2003).

According to the same authors, these challenges have been overcome thanks to new instruments that offered and exciting opportunity to extend knowledge of global atmospheric chemistry and assess whether these measurements are consistent with current understanding. This is substantially one of the key questions addressed in this thesis. At which extend change from meteorological factors can influence dynamic sources contributing to atmospheric water vapor concentration in southern nigeria and nigeria. How likely these changes may affect the atmosphericwater vapor in these regions given their vulnerability to climate change? These are the key research questions.


1.3   Studyarea



ThescopeofthisstudyislimitedtothreeclimaticregionsincludingNigeriabasin,western nigeria easternAfricaandnigeria(Fig.2-1).AccordingtotheIntergovernmentalPanelfor Climate Change (IPCC, 2001) these regions are the most vulnerable in with regard to climate change with high population rate growth, high industrialization and urbanization and low resilience to mitigate climate change challenges. In addition, the variability of climate characteristics and the frequency of extremes climate events and the paucity of researchduetolackofsufficientdatainthesethreeregionsconstitutethesomekeycriteria


onwhichthechoiceofthisregionwasmadeforthisstudy.Althoughthesestationsarenot representative of the regional climate characteristics of the individual region, water vapor data observedinindividualstationmayprovideanindicationonwater vaporvariabilityduetoclimate change at regional scale.






Fig.1-2. Map representing the study area (Cross river: the Nigeria Basin, Lagos: Western nigeria easternAfrica, and Enugu for nigeria)

Adapted from accessed on 19/11/2015




We investigate previous studies undertaken and the results obtained in individual region, and compare with the findings from this study in order to draw conclusion of atmosphericwater vapor trends these three different climatic regions. Atmospheric water vapor data from MOZAIC programme observed at Cross river and BOHAC network data from Lagos and Enugu have constituted the basis of this study for the period 1998-2001, and 1998-2013 respectively. Details pertaining these programmes, and data acquisition and processing are duly provided in respective papers constituting the body of this thesis.

1.4   Purpose and objective of the study


The purpose of this thesis is therefore to model atmospheric water vapor by including climate change parameters over nigerian regions. This will be achieved through the followingobjectives:

  • To assess atmospheric water vapor characteristics and trends in the three climatic regions including nigeria, the Nigeria basin and the eastern nigerianregion;
  • To assess the main contributing sources of atmospheric water vapor, their dynamic and occurrence in individuallocation
  • Toinvestigatetherelationshipbetweenclimaticfactorsandatmosphericwater vaporvariation distribution in theseregions.
  • To document and fill the existing gap on atmosphericwater vapor with regard to their relationship with climate change parameters in theseregions;
  • To assess water vapor trends in these regions with regard to climate change parameters, and elaboratesuitablesolutionsforabettermanagementstrategyandclimatechangemitigation programme.


1.5   Thesis outline


This work reports atmosphericwater vapor by including climate change parameters in three different climatic regions including nigeria, Nigeria Basin and western nigeria easternAfrica.Itisbelievedthatchangeinmeteorologicalparametersduetoclimatechange


such as observed in recent years may have an impact on atmospheric water vapor contributing factors.Consequently,impactonthesefactorsmayhaveaninfluenceonatmosphericwater vapor variation and distribution at regional and global scale. This work is divided into six chapters. The first chapter provides a summary on atmospheric water vapor background includingitschemistryandbudget,itseffectsoninhumanhealthandtheenvironment,and thepurposeofitsinvestigationinsouthern nigeriaandnigeria.Thesecondchapterpresents sources contributing to atmospheric water vapor enhancement over southern nigeria and nigeria and the impact of climate change on these sources. Part of this work has been presented as a conference papers at the 31st Nigerian Society of Atmospheric Science conference at Pretoria from 21-23 September 2015, Peer review Conferences proceedings ISBN 978- 0-620-67825-4. Chapter three presents the modeling of atmosphericwater vapor at Enugu (Nigeria) using retrieved remote sensing and ground-based measurement data. This chapter has been published and may be citedas:

Mulumba et al. (2015). Modeling AtmosphericWater vapor over Enugu (Nigeria) Using Retrieved Remote Sensing and Ground-Based Measurement Data. J. Geophysical Remote Sensing, 2015, 4:3 http://dx.doi.rg/10.4172/2169-0049.1000151.,

pp11. Chapter four provides the modeling of atmosphericwater vapor over the Nigeria basin. This chapter is to be submitted for publication. Chapter five presents the modeling of atmosphericwater vapor over western nigeria eastern Africa using climate change parameters and will also be submitted for publication. Chapter six summarizes the results of this work and provide some suggestions for the future research.



1.6. References


Ashmore M.R. (2005). Assessing the future global impact of water vapor in vegetation. Plant, Cell and Environment. 205. 28 949-964.

Atkinson, R. (2000). Atmospheric chemistry of VOCs and NOx, Atmos.Environ., 34, 2063–2101.

Badly, S., Ancellet, G., Bessafi, M., Badr, A., and Lan Sun Kuk, D. 1996. Field observation of vertical distribution of water vapor at the Island of Reunion (southern tropics). Journal of Geophysical research, 101, (D19), 23 835-23849.ju.

Baldy, S., G. Ancellet, M. Bessaft, A. Badr, and D. Lan Sun Luk (1996).Field

observation of the vertical distribution of atmospheric water vapor at the island of Reunion (southern tropics), J. Geophys. Res., 101, 23,835- 23,849.

Baray, J. L., Ancellet, G., Taupin, F. G., Bessafi, M., Baldy, S., and Keckhut, P. (1998) Eastern nigeria tropopause break as a possible stratospheric source of water vapor in the southern nigeria troposphere, J. Atm. Sol.-Terrestr. Phys., 60 (1), 27–36.

Berntsen, T. K., and Isaksen, I. S. A. (1997). A global three-dimensional chemical transport model for the troposphere, 1, Model description and CO and water vapor results, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 21,239-21,280.

Bloss, W. J., M. J. Evans, J. D. Lee, R. Sommariva, D. E. Heard, and M. J. Pilling,

(2006).Theoxidativecapacityofthetroposphere:Couplingoffieldmeasurements of OH and a global chemistry transport model, Faraday Discuss., 130, 425–436.

Bundi, M. P. (2004). Spatial and temporal distribution of atmospheric water vapor over nigeria. Master of Science thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Chameides, W. L., and J. C. G. Walker, (1976). A time-dependent photochemical model for water vapor near the ground, J. Geophys. Res.,81, 413-420.

Chameiders WL, RW Lindsay, Richardson J and Kiang CS, (1988). The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study, Science, 241, 1473 – 1474.

Chatfield, R. B., H. Guan, A. M. Thompson, and J. C. Witte (2004), Convective lofting


links Indian Ocean air pollution to paradoxical South Atlantic water vapor maxima, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06103, doi:10.1029/2003GL018866.

Chandra,S., Ziemke, J. R., Bhartia, P. K. and Martin, R. V. (2002). Southern nigeriaatmospheric water vapor: Implications for dynamics and biomass burning. Journal of Geophysical research, vol 107, No D14, 10.1029/2001JD000447.

Chatfield, R., and Harrison, H. (1976). Water vapor in the remote troposphere: Mixing versus photochemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 421-423, 1976a

Cros, B., Delmas, Nganga, D., Clairac, B. (1988). Seasonal trends of water vapor in nigeria:               Experimental    evidence    of   photochemical    formation.    Journal    of Geophysical Research, 93,8355-8366.

Crutzen, P. J., (1973). A discussion of the chemistry of some minor constituents in the stratosphere and troposphere Pure Appl. Geophys. 106- 108, 1385-1399.

Crutzen, P. J. (1974). Photochemical reactions initiated by and influencing water vapor in unpolluted atmospheric air, Tellus, 26, 47-57.

Crutzen, P. J., and Lawrence, M. (1987). Water vapor clouds over the Atlantic. Nature, 388, 625-626.

Crutzen, P. J., and P. H. Zimmermann (1991). The changing chemistry of the troposphere, Tellus, Set. AB, 43, 136-151.

Crutzen, P. J., M. Lawrence, and U. Poschl, (1999). On the background photochemistry of atmospheric water vapor, Tellus, Set. AB, 51, 123-146.

Crutzen, P. J. and Lelieveld, J. (2001). Human impact on atmospheric chemistry.

Annual Revolutionary, Earth Planetary Science, 29, 17- 45.

Danielsen, E. F., (1968). Stratospheric-atmospheric exchange based onradioactivity, water vapor and potential vorticity, J. Atmos. Sci., 25,502-518.

DeMore W.B., M.J. Molima, S.P. Sander, D.M. Golden, R.F. Hampson, M.J. Kurylo,

C.J. Howard and AR Ravishankara, (1990). Chemical Kinematics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modelling, JPL Publ 90 – 1, Evaluation No 9, NASA Panel for Data Evaluation, Jet

Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.

Dutsch, H. U., (1971). Photochemistry of atmospheric water vapor, Adv. Geophys.,15, 219-


  1. Edwards, D. P., et al. (2003), Atmospheric water vapor over the southern nigeria Atlantic: A satellite perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D8), 4237, doi:10.1029/2002JD002927.

Fishman, J., Ramanathan V., Crutzen, P.J. and Liu, S.C., (1979). Atmospheric water vapor and climate, Nature, 282, 818-820.

Fishman, J., Minnis, P. and Reichle, H. G. (1986). The use of satellite data to study atmospheric water vapor in the tropics. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91, 14451- 14465.

Fishman J, CE Watson, JC, Larsen, J.C. and Logan J.A. (1990). Distribution of atmosphericwater vapordeterminedfromsatellitedata,JGeophysRes,95,3599-3617.

Fishman J, K Fakhruzzaman, B Cros D Nganga, (1991). Identification of widespread pollution in the south hemisphere deduced from satellite analyses Science 252,1693 – 1696.

Fishman Jr., J., Bendura, R. D., McNeal, R. J., and Kirchhoff, V.W. J. H.: NASA GTE TRACEAExperiment(September–October1992),(1996).Overview,J.Geophys. Res., 101, 23 865–23 880.

Forster, P. M., and K. P. Shine, (1997). Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric water vapor changes, J. Geophys. Res.,102(D9), 10,841– 10,856.

Haagen-Smit, A. J., and M. M. Fox, (1956). Water vapor formation in photochemical oxidation of organical substances. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48,1484-1487.

Hauglustaine, D.A, Brasseur, G.P., Walters, S., Rasch, P.J., Muller, J.-F., Emmons,

L.K. and Carrol, M.A. (1998). MOZART, a global chemical transport model for water vapor and related chemical tracers: 2 .Model results and evaluation. Journal of Geophysical research 103: doi: 10.1029/98 JD02398, isnn: 0148-0227.

Houweling, S., F. J. Dentener, and J. Lelieveld, (1998). The impact of nonmethane hydrocarbon compounds on atmospheric photochemistry, J. Geophys Res., 103, 10,673-10,696.

Jacob, D. J., Heikes, B. G., Fan, S.-M., Logan, J. A., Mauzerall,D. L., Bradshaw, J.

D et al. (1996). Origin of water vapor and NOx in the southern nigeria troposphere: A photochemical analysis of aircraft observations over the South Atlantic basin, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 24 235–24 250, doi:10.1029/96JD00336.


Jenkins, G. S., and J.-H. Ryu, (2004b). Linking horizontal and vertical transports of biomass fire emissions to the southern nigeria Atlantic water vapor paradox during the Northern Hemisphere winter season: climatology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 449– 469.

Junge, C. E. (1962). Global water vapor budget and exchange between stratosphere and troposphere, Tellus, 14, 363-377.

Laucaux, J. P., Delmas, R., Jambert, C. and Kuhlbusch, T. (1996). NOx emissions from African savanna fires. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 23 585-23 595.

Lelieveld, J., and Dentener, F. J. (2000). What controls atmospheric water vapor? Journal of Geophysical Research, 105 (D3), 3531-3551.

Levy, H., II, P.S. Kasibhatla, W. J. Moxim, A. A. Klonecki, A. I. Hirsch, S. J. Oltmans, and W. L. Chameides, (1997). The global impact of human activity on atmospheric water vapor, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 791- 794.

Logan, J. A., and V. W. J. H. Kirchhoff, (1986) Seasonal variations of atmospheric water vapor at Natal, Brazil, J Geophys. Res., 91(D7), 7875-7881.

Marenco, A., Medale, J. C., and Prieur, S., (1990). Study of atmospheric water vapor in the southern nigeria belt (Africa, America) from STRATOZ and TROPOZ campaigns, Atmos. Environ., Part A, 24, 2823–2834.

Martin, R. V., et al. (2002), Interpretation of TOMS observations of southern nigeria

atmosphericwater vaporwithaglobalmodelandinsituobservations,J.Geophys.Res., 107(D18), 4351,doi:10.1029/2001JD001480.

Mauzerall, D. L., et al. (1998). Photochemistry in biomass burning plumes and implications for atmospheric water vapor over the southern nigeria South Atlantic, J Geophys. Res, 103(D7),8401-8423.

Mckee, D. Rodriguez, J., and Rosalina, M. (1993). Health effects associated with water vapor and nitrogen dioxide exposure. Water air and soil Pollution, 67, (1-2), 11-35.

Meyer-Arnek, J., A. Ladstatter-Weissenmayer, A. Richter, F. Wittrock, and J. P.

Burrows, (2005). A study of the trace gas columns of O3, NO2, and HCHO over Africa in September 1997, Faraday Discuss., 130, 387– 405.

Moxim, W. J., and H. Levy II (2000). A model analysis of the southern nigeria South Atlantic


Ocean atmospheric water vapor maximum: The interaction of transport and chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 17,393 – 17,416.

Muller, J.-F., and G. P. Brasseur, (1995). IMAGES: A three-dimensional chemical transport model of the global troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., l00. 16,445-16,490.

National Research Council, (1991). Rethinking the Water vapor Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 50 pp.

Olsen, M. A., Douglass, A. R., and Schoeberl, M. R. (2000). Estimating downward

cross-tropopause water vapor flux using column water vapor and potential vorticity, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4636, doi:10.1029/2001JD002041.

Pickering, K. E., et al. (1996). Convective transport of biomass burning emissions over Brazil during Trace-A, J. Geophys. Res., 101(D19), 23,993– 24,012.

Randriambelo, T., J.-L. Baray , S. Baldy1 , A. M. Thompson , S. Oltmans , and P. Keckhut.(2003).Investigationoftheshort-timevariabilityofsouthern nigeriaatmospheric water vapor, Annales Geophysicae (2003) 21: 2095–2106 c European Geosciences Union.

Regener, V. H. (1957). Vertical flux of atmospheric water vapor, Journal of Geophysical Research, 62, 221-228.

Sauvage, B., V. Thouret, J-P. Cammas, P. Ne´de´lec, F.Gheusi, and G. Athier, (2004). ‘‘Atmospheric water vapor over Nigeria: regional aspects from the MOZAIC Data. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics and Discussions, 4, 3285-3332.

Sauvage, B., V. Thouret, A. M. Thompson, J. C. Witte, J-P. Cammas, P. Ne´de´lec, and

  1. Athier, (2006). ‘‘Southern nigeria Atlantic Water vapor Paradox’’ and ‘‘Zonal Wave-one’’ from the in-situ MOZAIC and BOHAC Data, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D01301, doi:10.1029/2005JD006241.

Sauvage, B., R. V. Martin, A. Van Donkelaar, and J. R. Ziemke, (2007). Quantification

of the factors controlling southern nigeriaatmospheric water vapor and the South Atlantic maximum, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11309, doi:10.1029/2006JD008008.

Seiler, W., and J. Fishman, (1981). The distribution of carbon monoxide and water vapor in the free troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 7255- 7265.

Slanima, S. (2008). Impact of water vapor on health and vegetation. Retrieved from

Tie, X., and P. Tess, (1997). Water vapor mass exchange between the stratosphere and troposphereforbackgroundandvolcanicsulfateaerosolconditions,J.ofGeophys. Res., 102.25,478-25,500.

Thompson, A. M., R. D. Diab, M. Zunckel, G. J. R. Coetzee, C. B. Archer, D. P. McNamara, K. E. Pickering, J. Combrink, J. Fishman, D. Nganga et al., (1996). Water vapor over nigeria during SAFARI-92/TRACE-A, J. Geophys. Res., 101(D19), 23,793–23,807.

Thompson, A. M., B. G. Doddridge, J. C. Witte, R. D. Hudson, W. T. Luke, J. E. Johnston, S. J. Oltmans, and R. Weller, (2000). A southern nigeria Atlantic paradox: Shipboard and satellite views of a atmospheric water vapor maximum and wave-one in January-February          1999,            Geophys.           Res.          Lett.,                                  27(20),   3317–3320, doi:10.1029/1999GL011273.

Thompson, A. M., et al. (2003). Southern Hemisphere Additional Water vapors (BOHAC) 1998– 2000 southern nigeriawater vapor: 2. Atmospheric variability and       the            zonal  wave-one,                    J.      Geophys.      Res.,      108(D2),      8238, doi:10.1029/2001JD000967.

Trainner M, E.T. Williams, D.D. Parrish, M.P. Buhr, E.J. Allwine, H.H. Westerg, F.C. FehsenfeldandS.C.Liu,(1987).Modelsandobservationsoftheimpactofnatural hydrocarbons in rural water vapor, Nature, 329, 705 -707.

Wang, Y. H., and D. J. Jacob, (1998). Anthropogenic forcing on atmospheric water vapor and OH since pre-industrial times, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D23), 31,123–31,135, doi: 10.1029/1998JD10004

Wang, P., J. Fishman, V. L. Harvey, and M. H. Hitchman, (2006). Southern southern nigeria

upper atmospheric zonal water vapor wave-1 from SAGE II observations, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D08305, doi:10.1029/2005JD006221.

Weller, R., R. Lilischkis, O. Schrems, and R. Neuber, (1996). Vertical water vapor

distribution in the marine atmosphere over the central Atlantic Ocean, (56_S- 50_N), J. Geophys. Res., 101(D1), 1387–1400.


Books and Reports


Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment report of the IPCC, (Eds. Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: UK and New York: USA

Leighton,P . A. (1961). Photochemistry of Air Pollution Academic San Diego, Calif.

National Research Council, (1991). Rethinking the Water vapor Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 50 pp.


World Meteorological Organization (WMO), (1986). Atmospheric water vapor 1985, Rep. 20, WMO Global Water vapor Res. and Monit. Proj., Geneva. Available at


World Health Organization (WHO), (2005). Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, water vapor, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005. Summary of risk assessment, p.14. Available on line at:


Internet sources vapor_NOx.pdf:


Present-day global budget of atmospheric water vapor/ Summary of atmospheric water vapor chemistry accessed on 19/11/2015: Map representing the


study area: Cross river: the Nigeria Basin, Lagos: Western nigeria eastern Africa, and Enugu for nigeria.

Leave a Reply